Posts: 4164
Since: 5/6/2007
Status: offline
|
Been a few debates on this over the years , and indeed some snob factor attached if you have one, but personally if any of my cars was stolen
i wouldn,t want them back , after they had been hacked tracked by one of more joy riders / car thieves , who knows what untold damage your tyres suspension engine will have been put through, Would you really want it back after that
Its my firm belief that a trackers main purpose is not for the owner ( as most wouldn,t want there car returned ) but more for the insurance companies to recover and minimise their losses , surely the actuaries should have already calculated the losses/crashes etc into account when arriving at the premium total why in hell should i have to pay £300 plus a £100 a year to help them minimise their losses that would be stupid surely where's the benefit for me another con to make you think your getting cheaper insurance dont be fooled
Lets look at each scenario after a car is stolen
Tracker owner paid £300 to initiate plus £100 a year, less £30 off premium and gets thrashed beaten up car back
Non Tracker owner pays £30 more premium and gets guaranteed value payout , to go and buy another perfect example
Where's the positive angle for the owner
regards loz
< Message edited by lozcb -- 23/2/2010 13:13:00 >
_____________________________
Old pompous spods current stable
52 plate 4200 cc Lowered Tubi's and full GS body kit,steering wheel and rack
55 plate 4200 cc Gransport Full Larini system,AP Racing big brake upgrade ,more stuff pending
|
