Posts: 903
Since: 31/10/2006 Region: Salisbury Status: offline
|
Price seems fair, it isn't a bargain but very fair. The mileage debate is a funny old one, there are lots of Astons out there with "high" mileage these days and the residuals have been kicked in the guts too. Like the Maserati or say a Gallardo the actual problem is one of fear. High mileage 911's are normal, and are priced rationally because the perception is they won't break down every ten minutes. Despite being more common they whip every other manufacturer on depreciation for this reason alone. Is a QP (or GS) any less reliable than a 911?? They don't seem to be, nor any less capable of running up 100k, but the fear of the Biturbo still puts people off. More fool them and good news for us who just want to drive. Clive Sutton have a 2004 3,500 mile QP up for £39k - good garage queen material. For almost 40% less you could buy the car in this thread. Both have plenty of depreciation to go, but one has further to go than the other. What's the price range between a "high" (80k?) mile QPIV and a garage queen? £10-20k? Based on a highly scientific fag-packet calculation after a quick trawl it seems to be around 40-50%, but the amount of equity difference is of course smaller - in this case £10k. Using the QPIV's record as a template the person who buys the cheaper QPV gets to do say 35k miles over the ensuing five years, he'll lose £14,500 in depreciation if it's worth £10k with 75k on the clock. The person who buys the garage queen and keeps the mileage to below 10k can do 6,000 miles, and he'll lose around £19,000 in depreciation assuming it's worth £20k (I could only find one on Mobile.de at 14k km for 25k euro). That would (IMHO) be a good time to pick your garage queen up. Until then this car looks like good value, 29k more miles of fun and £4500 saved in to the mix  !
|